What is the 5-year rolling return of Quant Infrastructure Fund?

Across 2,170 overlapping 5-year holding periods between 7 January 2013 and 16 October 2026, the Direct plan of Quant Infrastructure Fund returned an average of 21.57% a year, with a median of 21.50%. The best 5-year stretch returned 48.28% a year and the worst returned -5.31%.

Has Quant Infrastructure Fund ever lost money over 5 years?

Yes. 2.4% of the 2,170 5-year holding periods in this fund's history ended below zero. The worst returned -5.31% a year, for someone who invested on 24 March 2015 and sold on 24 March 2020.

What is the difference between the Direct and Regular plans of Quant Infrastructure Fund?

Both plans hold the same portfolio. The Regular plan pays a commission to the distributor who sold it, deducted from the NAV every year, so it returns less. Over the same period, 5-year rolling returns averaged 21.57% a year on the Direct plan against 20.52% on the Regular plan, a difference of 1.06% a year.

What is the 1-year rolling return of Quant Infrastructure Fund?

Across 3,154 overlapping 1-year holding periods between 7 January 2013 and 16 October 2026, the Direct plan of Quant Infrastructure Fund returned an average of 25.19% a year, with a median of 13.56%. The best 1-year stretch returned 162.10% a year and the worst returned -36.11%.

What is the 3-year rolling return of Quant Infrastructure Fund?

Across 2,663 overlapping 3-year holding periods between 7 January 2013 and 16 October 2026, the Direct plan of Quant Infrastructure Fund returned an average of 21.36% a year, with a median of 18.69%. The best 3-year stretch returned 61.47% a year and the worst returned -9.94%.

What is the 7-year rolling return of Quant Infrastructure Fund?

Across 1,674 overlapping 7-year holding periods between 7 January 2013 and 16 October 2026, the Direct plan of Quant Infrastructure Fund returned an average of 20.56% a year, with a median of 21.29%. The best 7-year stretch returned 29.80% a year and the worst returned 4.10%.

What is the 10-year rolling return of Quant Infrastructure Fund?

Across 935 overlapping 10-year holding periods between 7 January 2013 and 16 October 2026, the Direct plan of Quant Infrastructure Fund returned an average of 20.62% a year, with a median of 20.49%. The best 10-year stretch returned 26.32% a year and the worst returned 16.62%.

quant Mutual Fund

Quant Infrastructure Fund — rolling returns

Infrastructure · NAV data as of 16 October 2026

3,397 daily NAV records since 7 January 2013

What is a rolling return?

A rolling return measures what you would actually have earned by investing on any given day and holding for a fixed number of years. Instead of quoting one figure from a single convenient start date, it repeats that calculation for every start date in the fund's history — 2,170 separate five-year windows for this fund. The gap between the best and the worst of those windows shows how much your entry date mattered.

Rolling return statistics

Annualised returns (CAGR), computed daily across every available start date.

Plan

Holding period

From

Compare against

Another fund

Index or category average

Direct plan · showing data from 7 January 2013 to 16 October 2026

Average rolling return

21.57%

Windows computed

2,170

Median return

21.50%

Standard deviation

11.26%

Best 5-year window

48.28%a year

Invested 24 Mar 2020 · exited 24 Mar 2025

Worst 5-year window

-5.31%a year

Invested 24 Mar 2015 · exited 24 Mar 2020

Consistency — share of 5-year windows

Above 0%: 97.6% (2,118 of 2,170)
Above 8%: 84.1% (1,824 of 2,170)
Above 12%: 81.1% (1,760 of 2,170)
Above 15%: 74.5% (1,617 of 2,170)

Chart resolution

Each point is one 5-year holding period, plotted against the date it began. Showing 435 of 2,170 windows.

Compare holding periods

The same statistics for every period, side by side. The highlighted column is the one shown above.

Rolling return statistics for Quant Infrastructure Fund by holding period
Holding period	1Y	3Y	5Y	7Y	10Y
Returns
Average	25.19%	21.36%	21.57%	20.56%	20.62%
Median	13.56%	18.69%	21.50%	21.29%	20.49%
Minimum	-36.11%	-9.94%	-5.31%	4.10%	16.62%
Maximum	162.10%	61.47%	48.28%	29.80%	26.32%
Std deviation	38.14%	14.56%	11.26%	5.78%	1.94%
Consistency
Above 0%	72.54%	96.43%	97.60%	100.00%	100.00%
Above 8%	61.73%	81.34%	84.06%	96.12%	100.00%
Above 12%	53.65%	65.68%	81.11%	91.46%	100.00%
Above 15%	46.70%	59.89%	74.52%	84.23%	100.00%
Coverage
Windows computed	3,154	2,663	2,170	1,674	935

Statistics are computed from all daily rolling windows in the selected range. Chart resolution changes the plotted line only, never these numbers.

Direct vs Regular plan

The same fund and the same portfolio. The Regular plan pays a commission to the distributor who sold it, which comes out of the NAV every year, so its returns run lower. Figures below are 5-year rolling returns over the period both plans share. Over this history the Direct plan averaged 1.06% a year more than Regular.

This fund's Regular plan has NAV going back to 21 September 2007, but its Direct plan only began on 7 January 2013. The 1,300 earlier Regular records are excluded here so both plans are measured over the same stretch of market history.

5-year rolling returns for Quant Infrastructure Fund, Direct plan compared with Regular plan
5-year rolling return	Direct	Regular
Average	21.57%	20.52%
Best window	48.28%from 24 Mar 2020	46.44%from 24 Mar 2020
Worst window	-5.31%from 24 Mar 2015	-5.78%from 24 Mar 2015
Windows computed	2,170	2,170

Common questions about Quant Infrastructure Fund

What is the 5-year rolling return of Quant Infrastructure Fund?: Across 2,170 overlapping 5-year holding periods between 7 January 2013 and 16 October 2026, the Direct plan of Quant Infrastructure Fund returned an average of 21.57% a year, with a median of 21.50%. The best 5-year stretch returned 48.28% a year and the worst returned -5.31%.
Has Quant Infrastructure Fund ever lost money over 5 years?: Yes. 2.4% of the 2,170 5-year holding periods in this fund's history ended below zero. The worst returned -5.31% a year, for someone who invested on 24 March 2015 and sold on 24 March 2020.
What is the difference between the Direct and Regular plans of Quant Infrastructure Fund?: Both plans hold the same portfolio. The Regular plan pays a commission to the distributor who sold it, deducted from the NAV every year, so it returns less. Over the same period, 5-year rolling returns averaged 21.57% a year on the Direct plan against 20.52% on the Regular plan, a difference of 1.06% a year.
What is the 1-year rolling return of Quant Infrastructure Fund?: Across 3,154 overlapping 1-year holding periods between 7 January 2013 and 16 October 2026, the Direct plan of Quant Infrastructure Fund returned an average of 25.19% a year, with a median of 13.56%. The best 1-year stretch returned 162.10% a year and the worst returned -36.11%.
What is the 3-year rolling return of Quant Infrastructure Fund?: Across 2,663 overlapping 3-year holding periods between 7 January 2013 and 16 October 2026, the Direct plan of Quant Infrastructure Fund returned an average of 21.36% a year, with a median of 18.69%. The best 3-year stretch returned 61.47% a year and the worst returned -9.94%.
What is the 7-year rolling return of Quant Infrastructure Fund?: Across 1,674 overlapping 7-year holding periods between 7 January 2013 and 16 October 2026, the Direct plan of Quant Infrastructure Fund returned an average of 20.56% a year, with a median of 21.29%. The best 7-year stretch returned 29.80% a year and the worst returned 4.10%.
What is the 10-year rolling return of Quant Infrastructure Fund?: Across 935 overlapping 10-year holding periods between 7 January 2013 and 16 October 2026, the Direct plan of Quant Infrastructure Fund returned an average of 20.62% a year, with a median of 20.49%. The best 10-year stretch returned 26.32% a year and the worst returned 16.62%.

Compare with other funds

Other Infrastructure funds

Figures are 5-year rolling return averages on the Direct plan, over each fund's own history. Funds with different start dates cover different market conditions, so these are a starting point for comparison rather than a like-for-like ranking.